thatlisagirl's Blog

A man buys, keeps and cares for foxes and coyotes for the purpose of providing chase for hunting dogs in a acred pen. Occasionaly, some of the gaming animals get killed by the dogs....not all the time, but sometimes.

Another man, keeps dogs at his house. He trains them and fights them against other dogs. Some of the dogs die from their injuries. Others are put down for their lack of performance. Sometimes, but not all the time.  

Besides a bitter divorce, celebrity status and media attention....what is the difference between the two? I dont really see much of a difference. Its interesting to see so many people absolutely tear Mike Vick down for what he did....I personally believes he deserves what he gets because he was wrong in the choices he made. But I read so many blogs with hunters defending their "sport" of having their dogs chase after game creatures for amusement to the core.  I believe this pen owner deserves what he gets because he made wrong choices. Yet, hundreds of people are tearing down Randy Travis for reporting only one side of a story of a fox pen owner and what its like to run and operate a pen and what has happened. At the same time, they tear down Mike VIck for having his dog fighting pen.

Really....whats the difference?