I don't have time to put this in my own words so here is a recent review by James Campbell Martin of the book The Drunkard's Walk: How Randomness Rules Our Lives by Leonard Mlodino that I found at bookslut.com. I don't do anything related to math or science very well but since too much time is spent trying to figure out why chit happens I think this book might be of service. Enjoy Martin's review and maybe if I get freed up later, I will switch this up enough to make it my own. If only I had some software to keep all these sources straight . . .
_____________________
People
have a problem: a lot of things in our world happen for no particular
reason, but it is hard for us to understand that or to accept it.
Leonard Mlodinow -- possibly the only physics Ph.D. who has also
written for MacGyver -- draws an example of this from
Hollywood. There, a studio head is often blamed or praised for hatever
happens while he's the boss, even when this makes no more sense than
blaming him for an earthquake that happens under his feet.
There are two kinds of books one could write about this problem. The first would show us how much randomness there really is in
the world, by exploring the field of mathematics called probability.
The second would explore why it is and how it is that humans think they
see cause and effect instead. Mlodinow has written a book of the first
kind that really wants to be a book of the second kind.
Here's how that second kind of book might go: We know that "'Our brains
are just not wired to do probability problems very well,'" as Mlodinow
quotes a Harvard mathematics professor. We aren't sure why that is, but
the going theory is that it was cheaper (in evolutionary terms) for
humans to see cause and effect too readily -- sure, we are wrong
sometimes, or maybe a lot of times, but the energy we save is worth it.
But the question this provokes is emotional and even spiritual: what
would it mean to accept that we live in a world where so many of the
most important outcomes of our lives are under our control only a
little bit, or not at all? And what kind of intellectual or spiritual
exercises could help us learn to see that with equanimity?
Mlodinow doesn't have much to say here. He tells us not to give up,
since a string of failures could just be the result of chance, "Or as
the IBM pioneer Thomas Watson said, 'If you want to succeed, double
your failure rate.'" But how does that help us when we so powerfully want to
give up? And he thinks that just learning some probability will help us
recognize the role of chance more easily (much like psychoanalysts feel
that gaining insight about one's neuroses, in itself, helps to cure
them). I'm sure there's some truth to that, but I suspect that people
have a strong emotional pull toward a cause-and-effect universe,
alongside (or interwoven with) the cognitive pull. We want control; we
want understanding. This is one reason we think the rich must be gifted
or virtuous, and the poor must be stupid or lazy (an example Mlodinow
gives) -- how terrifying if these outcomes were largely random! What
would it really mean to see the universe naked? Can we accept that we
are in some ways mis-designed for the world we inhabit, and resolve to
consciously live at odds with some of the undertows of our own nature?
It is just this sort of resolve that thinkers such as Steven Pinker and
Peter Singer (drawing from a field called evolutionary psychology)
believe is essential to our moral progress.
This second kind of book would be very speculative, and perhaps as a
scientist Mlodinow wants to hew to what he can be confident he
understands. But I think there is a personal voice and perhaps a
personal story that never quite make it above the surface of this book,
and that's a shame. Mlodinow writes in a breezy and lightly cynical
style (a style that may confuse some less-mathematical readers when
Mlodinow takes for granted that we will get which details are relevant
to an equation and which are just decoration). But I think I felt a
real desire to speak from the heart. As a scientist, Mlodinow has a
rare ability to explain from the inside what the study of randomness
has meant for his life as a human being. I hope he will do so in
another book.
Find this at http://www.bookslut.com/nonfiction/2008_07_013079.php
There's a book called The Sociopath Next Door that sounds very interesting. Maybe later.
| Member Comments | Total Comments: 6 |
|
|
mouthpeace
Aug 7, 2008 | 3:12 PM |
|||||
|
mouthpeace
Aug 7, 2008 | 3:16 PM |
|||||
|
mouthpeace
Aug 7, 2008 | 3:17 PM |
|||||
|
mouthpeace
Aug 7, 2008 | 3:22 PM |
|||||
|
mouthpeace
Aug 7, 2008 | 5:43 PM |
|||||
|
tazebell
Aug 8, 2008 | 12:18 AM |
|||||
|
|||||
In the cyber world I am a crime news junkie. I don't like talking politics and I don't like talking with liars. In the real world I am a lawyer that dislikes the practice of law because of the deceit in the profession. In my dream world I see myself living a pretty life, the kind that we all thought would be perfect. Thing is, I am having to put the stupid picket fence part of the dream in on my own.
Member Since: 3/19/2008