drerunner's Blog

Several days ago, Russian tanks roll across the border to aid separatists in breakaway South Ossetia, according to Russia. Since then, however, Russia has continued to make a B line towards the Georigian Capital.

When this international crisis first emerged, Obama was asked about the events. Obama ‘s first response was that Russia and Georgian should , both ,show restraint and talk. I must have missed something here. What was there to talk about? Russia had already decided to invade! Russia was the only one of the two that was the aggressor. There were at least 100 tanks (or more) rolling through the Georgia border. Obama was clearly behind and have been playing catch up ever since.

On the contrary, McCain was “spot on” and called it for what it was-an aggressive and unwarranted invasion by Russia. McCain immediately denounced Russia and its invasion and went on to say he never trusted Putin in the first place. Unlike Obama, McCain did not do a wait and see on the issue. He ,like most of us, saw that the Russians had committed an unforgivable and horrible act upon a peaceful democracy. A democracy that is a friend  to  the United States. This kind of action should have been a no-brainier for the Obama camp. But once again, they missed it. Obama was a deer in headlights.

Interestingly, once the Obama team was able to catch up to what President Bush, Condoleezza Rice and the McCain camp were all expressing, he quickly changed his stance for “political speediness” to correct his initial response. But isn’t this always the case with the Obama camp? When the Obama camp don’t know how to immediately respond to an issue, they wait to see what their opponent will say and then attempt to mirror their opponent’s response.

Also, although the Obama's camp claims everything is always Bush’s fault, they even went as far as to infer that their response was more similar to President Bush than McCain’s response on the Georgia. What? Are these folks for real? Ya, Ya,Ya!

It was also fascinating to hear that a clone named”Susan Rice” who’s been hired on by the Obama camp (no relation to Condoleezza Rice) stated McCain‘s statement were belligerent and caused the Russians to act more aggressively. Where did d they find this loon? She is blaming McCain for Russia’s invasion of Georgia when Russia already has several hundred tanks bulldozing through the Georgians towns! How absurd and loony is that statement??? Unbelievable!!!!!

Lastly, touring Obama’s Headquarter website, here is what one of his supporters wrote:

“ I was so proud of Obama's response to the Georgian crisis. His initial response was thoughtful and measured and the second response was appropriate to the situation after BO had gathered more information from the Georgian President.... in stark contrast to Sen. McCain's 'mouthing off'.... something we don't need...America is already stretched thin, involved in wars on two fronts, thanks to Bush and this idiotic administration.”

Folks, with this kind of thinking, God help us if Barrack Obama is elected! The 3am call is more real than we all realize and Barak Obama has already shown us his “deer in headlight” moment…..

I don't think people are supporting Obama because he is a black man. Sure , he is smart ,charismatic and a bright politician but sorry to disappoint, it's not because of his pigment. Maybe he gets a good number of votes due to it, but that wasn't the crushing reason for his upset of Hillary. Like him or not, the guy is very very impressive. His delivery has been remarkable over the past year. But all of those reasons still would not (out of no where) sling shotted him beyond one of the most powerful politically machines we have ever witness- the Clintons.

No way folks , this was much larger. The reason Obama was successful in overthrowing "Clinton" was clearly due to something else. In 2004, after the Kerry lost, Move on .com and the radical loony left vowed they would own the Democratic party in 08 !They made true on their goal! Today, they are one of Obama's strongest financial and political supporters. "Move on" also support many other radical groups that are also pro-Obama. It intrigues me ,as well, that Obama strongest support appears to be those who hold "quiet hatred" towards their own country. (A country ,mind you, that gives them freedom like no other.)

It's clear Obama supporters know that he is the best candidate that can make the U.S. A . weaker in the eyes of the world. That's what his supporters want! Call it guilt or misguided views that are based on MTV, Hollywood and foreigners (quietly and politely) who would love to see another 911 in America. In the last 7 years ,after 911, it has become a transparent phenomenon. What ever is the cause, higher minds must prevail . Lastly before I leave you, The the top 10 groups supporting Obama:

1. White guilt
2.Yong white followers of idiotic rap music.
3. Bush Haters
4. American Haters
5. Elitist Hollywood Loons
6. 60 years old who want to relive their radical 60s years.
7.  people who ignore  the fact that political correctness has gone a muck.
8.  People who think Obama may give them something for free.
9. David Lettermen and his entire audience!
10 Americans who hate America!

Take that David letterman! You America hater!!!

Many liberals ,lately, are pointing out how Kennedy and Reagan talked to our enemies Russia and China in the past. Obama is running with this nonsense. Here is ,however, where they and Obama missed the whole shebang!

Firstly, You don't talk to people who say they want to obliterate another country. That's naive and Reckless. As I understand History, when we were talking to Russia , we told them they had 72 hours to move their missiles or it was on!! The Russian leader saw our missile pointed and he acted accordingly.

When we talked to China, China knew they didn't want (at that time) "fat man" and "little boy" being dropped on them like Japan had. China had (and still do) nearly a billion people and a lot of them very poor. There was no way China could go head to head militarily with us and face Chinese being lost fatally. China knew if we had to, we would use a "fat boy". It would have been a great risk. So china talked.

When Regan spoke to Russia , He told them to tear down the wall, and had the missiles pointing at the same time. Without those missiles pointing , Russia would have given Reagan the finger and continued its communist expansion!

If we ever do talk to Iran , they better act in 72 hours and they better realize if they walk away with propaganda intent , "fat man" and "little boy" wont be far behind. But I am afraid Obama does not have that in him. He would be taken advantage of so easily by world leaders. Obama would not talk with weapons pointed. He would , in fact, get rid of them. He kinda reminds me of the journalist who went to Pakistan to talk to the terrorist and they said sure, we will talk. We won't harm you. He went blindly and in good faith, believing these people that they would be open to talk. They found the guy's head somewhere in the desert months later. When we(The U.S.A) sat down and talked in the past ,those countries saw what was standing behind us ........

http://video.stumbleupon.com/#p=3xdgkays4k