MyFox
 

andrea's spare time

by awatkins from fox-26

Last Post 7 days, 5 hours Ago


broken records can be looked at as good or bad... good... for example in the olympics, bad if it's something that repeats until its welcome wears out.

now we've learned that exxon mobil broke the its previous record of record profits... with second quarter earnings coming in at $11.68 billion dollars. its previous record was the the 4th quarter of 2007... earning $11.66 billion.

i can imagine that exxon mobil stockholders won't get tired of this kind of broken record... but what about you? do you feel it's greed like many do? or do you appreciate that that's what capitalism is... and maybe even see that exxon mobil's success helps houston and texas as a whole?

you know one of the crazy things about this record profit announcement. it triggered a drop in exxon mobile's stock price by almost 5%! a drop! analysts thought the company would make even more! i don't even know what to think about that.

what do you think?

9 Comments |  Add a Comment

Member Comments Total Comments: 9
Page 1 of 1
torchbearer read my blog view my photos
Aug 1, 2008 | 9:38 AM

i think that Michael Moorer was right in his film, Farenheit911.
I agree with a previous blogger who predicted this in 2000.
i think they have found a very good loophole.
i think the Pubs will drop gas prices now down to maybe 2.00 a gal. to get pressure off election.
one thing i think is strange.
diesal fuel which truckers use to move our products remains 1.00 a gal more than gas. you would think that they would focus on consumers, not our industry, where it will affect the economy?
kind of adds fuel to the belief, perhaps, as more consumers vote, and probably as much fuel used commercially?
i really doubt that it costs more to produce one than the other, since i have seen prices higher both ways.
Perhaps the 5% is a suck-in for investors as the profits have been made, and perhaps buying now not a good idea?
These are just my beliefs, and we shall see.

mik1of3 read my blog view my photos
Aug 1, 2008 | 9:53 AM

I have no problem with capitalism on its own. But when a company moans and groans about costs and overhead, THEN posts profits like that? It really ticks me off. The oil industry is a prime example. They made buttloads of money, then try to say, no, you're only getting part of the picture. That's BEFORE operating expenses. Sorry, I work for a small business, and profit is what's left AFTER all the costs of doing business is deducted from the total money made.
Do a little digging and those 'operating expenses' turn out to be huge bonuses for the executive board.
Please. We aren't as stupid as they seem to think.

jeeterbug read my blog view my photos
Aug 1, 2008 | 11:13 AM

seriously, i'm not energy or business buff by any means, but i still don't get how this can be.

ok, the oil execs say they the inflation of gas prices at the pumps is a direct result of it costing them more to obtain the oil, therefore passing the increase onto the consumer right?

well, if that's the case, then how can they be making a record profit of this magnitude if they're having to pay so much more on exportation etc?!??!?!!?!?!?!?!?????

like i said, i'm no business/oil buff, but seriously, am i the only one this doesn't make sense to?

Isci_the_Weatherman read my blog view my photos
Aug 1, 2008 | 6:17 PM

Andrea, I think what people seem to resent (myself included) is not the profit itself, but what is done with the profit. The straw that broke the camel's back was the $400 million given as a severance package to their former CEO. People hear that a guy retires and gets a check for 4/10 of a billion bucks and they get pretty hacked off.

If Exxon/Mobil took the profit and gave their emplyees raises I doubt if anyone would hold that against them. No one likes the idea of paying extremely high prices at the pump while the corporate fatcats are making hundreds of millions of dollars.

torchbearer read my blog view my photos
Aug 1, 2008 | 8:21 PM

Gee, Isci--
DON'T know about that!
When someone takes advantage of a situation--
When someone is making ENORMOUS profits & SOME prosper, while MILLIONS can't get to work--I would tend to think that "a bit selfish, & UNAMERICAN"!
Funny, the word "monopoly" comes to mind--?

We are all entitled to a fair profit, a living wage consumerate with our abilities--maybe you been around chassan too long!
Oh well, to each his own!

FYInfo read my blog view my photos
Aug 2, 2008 | 12:28 PM

Yes, monopolies.
We have only one cable company in Houston (Comcast) who controls the market at a premium double Warner who they bought out.
GMC mad a reported loss of $16 billion in the first quarter although they gave out bonuses to their directors and chief of staff.

Diesel should always be cheaper than gas.
It's the last drain off from the distillation columns after the higher octanes are collected. (almost a waste fuel)
It always was cheaper than gas, SO why not now ????

torchbearer read my blog view my photos
Aug 2, 2008 | 3:51 PM

fyinfo--
I AGREE 100%
I cannot understand why gas is 3.50 & diesel is 4.90. I have seen diesel lower than gas, so if there is a (natural cost) difference why would it change from lower to higher?
(If you are right, you answered it for me!)
You would think that to keep the economy stable you would rip off the people, & lower prices for the truckers---IF you want to to "help" someone?
They are going the opposite way, evidently to get the voters out--& screw the economy!
(Those $400-700.00 fill ups are hard to turn down!)

I have a theory that a lot of intelligent people know that we are being "monopolized", (which many disagree with) but I won't go there!

yahyamoro read my blog
Aug 2, 2008 | 9:31 PM

HEY EXXON ! BORROW SOME BILLIONS TO GENERAL MOTORS TO HELP OUT IN ITS TIME OF NEED ! I NEED MY JOB , PLEASE ...

rds1969
Aug 5, 2008 | 12:38 AM

Everyone only looks at the dollar amount that EM made. No one is looking at the profit margin...the percentage of profit to expenses. EM, and other oil companies are making approximately 7 1/2 % profit. The government makes more money off a gallon of gas than the oil companies do. Who are we to tell a company how much profit is acceptable? Do we tell Leo DiCaprio how much he can make, especially for the crap he puts out? Do we tell Tiger Woods that he makes too much and should have to give some of it back? What most people don't understand is that it still costs about the same to remove the oil from the ground as it did 5 years ago, while the world spot price has risen due to increase in demand. Increased demand mostly from China and India.

DRILL HERE, DRILL NOW. PAY LESS

Page 1 of 1


Write your comment below:




awatkins

i love reporting the news... and the bright side of reporting before the sun comes up is that i can keep my cool! no melting in the houston heat at that hour. if you're up and about and tuning in, e-mail me a comment on the story i'm doing. we love to get your input. watkins@fox26.com

Member Since: 12/11/2006