MyFox
 

TomHaynes's Blog

by TomHaynes from Atlanta

Last Post 1 day, 13 hours Ago


President Bush he'll listen to lawmakers who want to temporarily lower the gasoline tax to curb skyrocketing prices.  Do you think it's a good solution to the problem of high gas prices?  Let me know what you think.
22 Comments |  Add a Comment

Member Comments Total Comments: 22
Page 1 of 2
1
Last
jcland300
Apr 29, 2008 | 10:34 PM

No gas tax reduction is going to help at $3.60 a gallon. No stimulus is going to stimulate the economy when most of us will pay bills. The only...and only thing that will help is for the oil companies to be content with the billions in profits they've made...I suppose that's not enough money for them. I believe this is a last attempt for the oil tycoons to milk the poeple before Bush is out of office. He's made a lot of rich people richer.

expert1
Apr 29, 2008 | 10:35 PM

No-it won't save us much, but the President and Congress feel good.

We need to start drilling on our land for oil NOW. Our country cannot function on $4+ gallon for gasoline. Develop other alternatives as a goal, but they way Congress and the President have handled the gasoline shortage is unnacceptable. Are they smarter than a 5th grader? I think not!

Cromagnon read my blog view my photos
Apr 29, 2008 | 10:37 PM

Yes, TAX CUTS ALWAYS WORK! Nothing good ever came from RAISING TAXES.

Cromagnon read my blog view my photos
Apr 29, 2008 | 10:38 PM

I say CUT ALL THE TAXES! Think of the economic STIMULATION THEN!

expert1
Apr 29, 2008 | 10:43 PM

Blame the oil companies all you want. But Congress is responsible for stopping new drilling, I think it was 3 senators that voted against it.

It's the elite congress that's the problem. Those "career" congress people have no clue what we do to clip coupons shop for discounts because we are middle class. Most of congress are quite wealthy. They could not live the way most of us do in this country everyday. They are to busy planning their next trip to countries at tax payers expense.

It is a supply problem. With China and India hogging up more oil now it's gonna be a supply problem for a long time and we are gonna pay high prices at the pump for a very long time.

Austellian
Apr 29, 2008 | 10:44 PM

Cutting gas taxes this summer may be a good thing but we all know good things come to an end. What would be the price of gas when the tax is returned? What tax with be raised to compensate for the anticipated losses in the "gas tax?" Rather than simply cutting the tax, it should be transferred to the oil companies who has a Profit margin in recent quarters while all other companies were merging and laying off thousands of workers...4650 workers being cut at AT&T. What a mess.

expert1
Apr 29, 2008 | 10:45 PM

FAIR TAX!! The government would collect more taxes than they ever dreamed because finally everyone would be paying-no loopholes for the rich.

expert1
Apr 29, 2008 | 10:52 PM

It won't make any difference if they cut the gas tax .20/gallon this summer if it cost us $4 gallon or more. The truckers pay even more and our country is dependent on truckers.

Regardless what the profit margin is, no new source of supply means continued high gas prices. You could yank every penny of profit from the oil companies tomorrow, but tomorrow night we still don't have any new supply.

Disgustedallyear
Apr 29, 2008 | 11:11 PM

I think it is moronic, what do they think .18 cents is going to do when gas is $5.00 a gallon. why don't Obama and clinton take some of that 60+ Million their blowing on losing candidacies and help out stuggling homeowners who got suckered into a bad loan by unscrupulous mortgage bankers.Some of my neighbors have been in their homes for 30+ yrs. and losing them over some piss change from a refinance with an Adjustable Rate Mortgage. I'm a Realtor in the West End of Atlanta and if it was't for the internet I would not be able to show a listing, It's not like I can take the bus. NOW WHAT. My property value has plummeted due to the $25,000 foreclosures across and down the street, It's not just one I have 19 foreclosures on my street and all of them a emty enticing vagrants and crackheads. A tax cut on gas will do nothing for me or My neighbors.

BlindSquirrel read my blog
Apr 29, 2008 | 11:20 PM

All the liberals are responsible for this. We can't drill for our on land because of environmental concerns.

Outrageous taxes, no drilling, no new nuclear plants, and demands from countries like China, India and the like is causing this. Not the oil companies.

TomHaynes read my blog
Apr 29, 2008 | 11:44 PM

(I just wrote a post and it got deleted. Don't you hate when that happens?) What I was saying, was I think gas prices, besides supply and demand, seem to be tied to politics. If we can sort out the refinery issue, Anwar, off shore drilling, the strategic oil reserve and, yes, taxes (both federal and local), maybe we can get somewhere. Like our bottled water, we love to consume gas -- and we're willing to pay for it.

bklynqnsgirl
Apr 29, 2008 | 11:50 PM

Lowering the gas tax will not solve anything because two weeks later it will just go right back up. The govenment needs to seriously regulate gas prices and severely penalize gas gougers. For example, there is no reason why one Shell gas station has gas for $3.53 and one block down, at another Shell, it is $3.69. I know there are govenment workers driving to work, too, who see the ridiculous varying prices.

expert1
Apr 30, 2008 | 12:08 AM

Hi Tom Haynes,
I think you about covered it! It's more than one quick solution like a gas tax holiday. Yeah right. You know how holidays go: you work twice as hard getting ready for the holiday and when it's are over, you work twice as hard catching up. Nothing is free. The piper will be waiting in line to collect. But now Congress can stand up and feel good because they did something for the little helpless people who can't afford the gasoline. We need to get rid of the career politicians with younger business people.

Bottom line folks, we are gonna have high gasoline cost for a long time.

I think the answer to "bklynqnsgirl" comment about the government regulating gas prices is called the "free market". People will pass up the higher Shell station and buy from the lower Shell station and the higher Shell station will go out of business because it wasn't competitive.

You NEVER, NEVER, NEVER want the government to regulate prices. How would you like the government to regulate your salary? If you don't want to pay the higher price at one store, then don't buy gas there. The rest will take care of itself. Sounds like the Shell stores were to close to each other anyway.

trippydude read my blog
Apr 30, 2008 | 12:17 AM

The above are all good points valid in every way. We let big Oil both here and the middle east dictate how our economic engine runs A gas tax cut is a band-aid solution like the stimulus package, both are just reach-arounds by the congress & the Pres. while they shove their ineffective elitist political penises up our arses. Demand that the oil co. lower there prices or face Caps, Demand that middle eastern OPEC nations step up production or face sanctions to Make them adhere to agreed resolutions and binding contracts on production vs. demand. If they don't hit'em where it hurts in there foreign aid bellies,and stop arms shipments. America is a great power and whells a mighty club. Ah some say we'll lose them as allies, Doh well maybe in the short term but I think not. We'll be respected once again on the world stage. And they'll know the meaning of the term "Tread On Us Not for in God only do we fear!" This namby-pamby go quitely into the night politics and poussy footed dimplomacy is going to starve & weaken our nation. Lets put a boot up somebodys arse instead of letting a political penis slide up ours.....Trippy

nriley
Apr 30, 2008 | 12:43 AM

I do not think that temporarily lowering the gas tax will provide much real relief to many Americans, especially if the rates continue to increase. Perhaps a better approach would be for the Oil companies to offer volume based gas cards to consumers, instead of the existing dollar based cards. For example, today I can go to a Shell gas station and purchase a gas card for say $50.00. What if instead of buying the gas card for $50.00, I could purchase a 20 gallon gas card (of 87, 89, or 93 octane-- whatever my vehicle requires) at whatever the existing price/per gallon charge is at the time of purchase. I am not sure if this is something that government could require or if it's something that Oil companies could initiate themselves. Of course there could be sub markets that evolve where individuals might purchase and attempt to resell the cards later at a profit, and all the ramification for that would have to be thought out and perhaps processes put in place to curtail this a bit. However, I tend to think that although rising gas prices are very painful for many, that this slight ability for Americans to have a little more control over their gas "budget" would be beneficial to some. The inability to predict what one's fuel costs will be on a weekly, monthly, or even annual basis can wreak havoc on household budgets. If I know how may miles I drive on a weekly basis, it's conceivable that I could purchase enough fuel to cover my fuel costs for an entire year. At a minimum, I would have a bit of control over what is currently the most variable part of my monthly budge

nriley
Apr 30, 2008 | 12:44 AM

I do not think that temporarily lowering the gas tax will provide much real relief to many Americans, especially if the rates continue to increase. Perhaps a better approach would be for the Oil companies to offer volume based gas cards to consumers, instead of the existing dollar based cards. For example, today I can go to a Shell gas station and purchase a gas card for say $50.00. What if instead of buying the gas card for $50.00, I could purchase a 20 gallon gas card (of 87, 89, or 93 octane-- whatever my vehicle requires) at whatever the existing price/per gallon charge is at the time of purchase. I am not sure if this is something that government could require or if it's something that Oil companies could initiate themselves. Of course there could be sub markets that evolve where individuals might purchase and attempt to resell the cards later at a profit, and all the ramification for that would have to be thought out and perhaps processes put in place to curtail this a bit. However, I tend to think that although rising gas prices are very painful for many, that this slight ability for Americans to have a little more control over their gas "budget" would be beneficial to some. The inability to predict what one's fuel costs will be on a weekly, monthly, or even annual basis can wreak havoc on household budgets. If I know how may miles I drive on a weekly basis, it's conceivable that I could purchase enough fuel to cover my fuel costs for an entire year. At a minimum, I would have a bit of control over what is currently the most variable part of my monthly budge

expert1
Apr 30, 2008 | 9:46 AM

The best way for us to control the gas supply and price is not being dependent on other countries to supply us oil, Those who control the supply control the price and control us.

China has partnered with Cuba to drill 46 miles off the Florida Keys in the Gulf of Mexico for oil. The Florida Gov. doesn't want drilling 45 miles off the Florida coast. He says it will hurt tourism to his state. He doens't get it-if people can't afford the gas to get to his state, there isn't any tourism. Brazil goes on to find multiple oil reserves off their coast while we have vast oil reserves sitting in primitive Anwar. The Anwar fight has been going on for years. I understand it takes about 10 years to set up drilling and getting the oil out-so if Congress had approved drilling in Anwar, we would be very close to creating our own supply and you can bet prices would be lower.

Recently there was another huge oil find in North Dakota. Think about the employment opportunities for North Dakaota. People up there need jobs too! There is abundant oil for us, yet Congress sleeps in their chairs while other countries go get the oil.

Many do not know that nearly everyone in Congress is filthy rich. Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Hillary Clinton, Rockerfeller, Kennedy, these folks and othes are RICH. They do NOT live the way the rest of us do. THEY DO NOT FEEL OUR PAIN. Get rid of them. Let's put folks in Congress that are NOT beholding to lobbyist groups because they have been there for 40+ years. Folks, we have got to make some changes in Congress or we will never get out of th

Mercedes08
Apr 30, 2008 | 3:53 PM

People need to stop whining about gas prices. You made a choice to buy that 12 MPG SUV so deal with it. You should have bought yourself a Prius if your that concerned with the price of gas.

ATLANTA NEEDS MORE FUEL EFFICIENT CARS AND LESS SMOG. I say raise the gas tax and build better roads and clean the air as a bonus!

goneforgood
Apr 30, 2008 | 10:01 PM

Yup everybody makes valid points on this issue.
the weakest opinion is about the oil company's profits, is getting old though. No one has pointed out that opening up Anwar , the Gulf Coast and the Dakota fields has a TRIPLE BONUS ! Not only do we relieve some of our dependance on foreign oil-countries by drilling domestically, but we also have the added benefit of keeping the money here instead of sending it to the Saudis & others.
PLUS we create jobs in constuction,drilling, equipment industries, support services and enviromental protection safeguard services, etc ! We cut off funding to radicals. Keep the money here - pay down debt and employ people and do it in a clean safe way like Prudhoe Bay.
It's a freakin NO BRAINER except for a democrat !

virgowi
May 1, 2008 | 10:52 AM

All valid points. All of the above. They should cut taxes, find more efficient automobiles, drill on our land, AND get something done about these oil companies. They are the ones that need to be cutting prices!!! We need to put the ball back in OUR court!!

Page 1 of 2
1
Last


Write your comment below:




TomHaynes

Credibility, experience and a bit of an edge; that pretty much sums up Tom Haynes (tom.haynes@myfoxatlanta.
com), a member of FOX 5’s anchor team. Tom joined FOX 5 Atlanta in December 2007 to anchor the 11 p.m. newscast, FOX 5 News Edge. Before coming to FOX 5, Tom worked in Miami at the top-rated FOX affiliate, WSVN-7. From the anchor desk to live reporting, Tom sharpened his journalistic expertise while covering stories such as the U.S. led invasion in Iraq, the sniper shootings that terrorized Washington D.C. and the unprecedented hurricane seasons that battered Florida and the Gulf Coast year after year. Tom began his career in 1994 as a production assistant for CNN’s Larry King Live in Washington, D.C. He then moved to the network’s headquarters here in Atlanta where he worked as a producer, reporter and ultimately an anchor. Tom now returns to Atlanta with even more experience, more passion and a desire to bring something different to local television. Tom is excited be front and center in FOX 5’s innovative and interactive newscast. Tom wants to engage viewers and hopes you will interact with him in any medium, be it over the air or online. To talk about issues that matter to you or to simply sound off, tell Tom yourself on his blog.

Member Since: 1/10/2008