MyFox
 

Gracie

by GratefulGrace from Denton

Last Post 103 days, 13 hours Ago


The Real Culprits In This Meltdown

By INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY | Posted Monday, September 15, 2008 4:20 PM PT

Big Government: Barack Obama and Democrats blame the historic financial turmoil on the market. But if it's dysfunctional, Democrats during the Clinton years are a prime reason for it.

Obama in a statement yesterday blamed the shocking new round of subprime-related bankruptcies on the free-market system, and specifically the "trickle-down" economics of the Bush administration, which he tried to gig opponent John McCain for wanting to extend.

But it was the Clinton administration, obsessed with multiculturalism, that dictated where mortgage lenders could lend, and originally helped create the market for the high-risk subprime loans now infecting like a retrovirus the balance sheets of many of Wall Street's most revered institutions.

Tough new regulations forced lenders into high-risk areas where they had no choice but to lower lending standards to make the loans that sound business practices had previously guarded against making. It was either that or face stiff government penalties.

The untold story in this whole national crisis is that President Clinton put on steroids the Community Redevelopment Act, a well-intended Carter-era law designed to encourage minority homeownership. And in so doing, he helped create the market for the risky subprime loans that he and Democrats now decry as not only greedy but "predatory."

Yes, the market was fueled by greed and overleveraging in the secondary market for subprimes, vis-a-vis mortgaged-backed securities traded on Wall Street. But the seed was planted in the '90s by Clinton and his social engineers. They were the political catalyst behind this slow-motion financial train wreck.

And it was the Clinton administration that mismanaged the quasi-governmental agencies that over the decades have come to manage the real estate market in America.

As soon as Clinton crony Franklin Delano Raines took the helm in 1999 at Fannie Mae, for example, he used it as his personal piggy bank, looting it for a total of almost $100 million in compensation by the time he left in early 2005 under an ethical cloud.

Other Clinton cronies, including Janet Reno aide Jamie Gorelick, padded their pockets to the tune of another $75 million.

Raines was accused of overstating earnings and shifting losses so he and other senior executives could earn big bonuses.

In the end, Fannie had to pay a record $400 million civil fine for SEC and other violations, while also agreeing as part of a settlement to make changes in its accounting procedures and ways of managing risk.

But it was too little, too late. Raines had reportedly steered Fannie Mae business to subprime giant Countrywide Financial, which was saved from bankruptcy by Bank of America.

At the same time, the Clinton administration was pushing Fannie and her brother Freddie Mac to buy more mortgages from low-income households.

The Clinton-era corruption, combined with unprecedented catering to affordable-housing lobbyists, resulted in today's nationalization of both Fannie and Freddie, a move that is expected to cost taxpayers tens of billions of dollars.

And the worst is far from over. By the time it is, we'll all be paying for Clinton's social experiment, one that Obama hopes to trump with a whole new round of meddling in the housing and jobs markets. In fact, the social experiment Obama has planned could dwarf both the Great Society and New Deal in size and scope.

There's a political root cause to this mess that we ignore at our peril. If we blame the wrong culprits, we'll learn the wrong lessons. And taxpayers will be on the hook for even larger bailouts down the road.

But the government-can-do-no-wrong crowd just doesn't get it. They won't acknowledge the law of unintended consequences from well-meaning, if misguided, acts.

Obama and Democrats on the Hill think even more regulation and more interference in the market will solve the problem their policies helped cause. For now, unarmed by the historic record, conventional wisdom is buying into their blame-business-first rhetoric and bigger-government solutions.

While government arguably has a role in helping low-income folks buy a home, Clinton went overboard by strong-arming lenders with tougher and tougher regulations, which only led to lenders taking on hundreds of billions in subprime bilge.

Market failure? Hardly. Once again, this crisis has government's fingerprints all over it.

5 Comments |  Add a Comment

Member Comments Total Comments: 5
Page 1 of 1
Marks read my blog view my photos
Sep 25, 2008 | 9:02 PM

And isn't it funny how the mainstream media (MSM) simply refuses to report the facts? Can't we (the media) just do our job? After all, "we" all want Obama...how could we undermine "His" campaign by reporting facts.

Marks read my blog view my photos
Sep 25, 2008 | 9:03 PM

BTW - Hi Grace!!!

holly75240 read my blog
Sep 25, 2008 | 10:08 PM

Don't forget Barney Frank and other dems in the House structured the legislation Clinton signed and pressured Fannie and Freddie to underwrite more and more subprime mortgages to minorities. Dodd profited big time from those toxic loans. Buyers making 20K a year were purchasing 200K homes with no means to repay them. Congress didn't care. Obama and the black caucus were also involved. Should the Bush administration have been proactive in exposing this to the public? Of course. There is plenty of blame to go around.

Lost_Hwy read my blog
Sep 26, 2008 | 12:02 AM

And don't forget that McCain has always been for deregulation of these companies up until it blew up in his face. And don't forget his pal Phil Gramm, a lobbyist (one of those McCain says he distanced himself from) for home mortgages that helped lead to the current crisis. Hmmmm, seems the Reps have to share some of the blame, huh?

GratefulGrace read my blog view my photos
Sep 26, 2008 | 6:04 AM

But the facts stated in this article are

1. True
2. Not reported by the MSM (thanks marks)

Having said that, Lost, I agree with you. Liberal politicians are not the only ones at fault and Reps do indeed share some of the blame.

Having said that so many Americans are sick and tired of "reporters" of the media not doing their jobs and reporting both sides of issues.

BTW, is that you in your avie? You're a good-lookin' guy!

Page 1 of 1


Write your comment below:




Member Since: 8/9/2006